Showing posts with label fm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fm. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Winegard HD-6000 FM and HD Digital Antenna Review

Winegard HD-6000 FM and HD Digital Antenna
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
When I replaced my old analog FM tuner with a new one that receives HD, I was not satisfied with the signal strength and quality that I was getting from HD via my indoor dipole antenna. It was time for me to upgrade and this was the solution.
I chose this antenna because it has a reasonable price, is a classic Yagi design and is light in weight. I live in a two-story house, but mounted this antenna above the gable of a single-story addition. Because I live about halfway between New York City and Philadelphia I installed a rotor, so I can aim this antenna in different directions from inside. My installation places the antenna about 20 feet above the ground. I was prepared to mount this antenna higher if necessary but it works just fine where it is. Since this antenna is lightweight and has little wind loading, no guy wires or special bracing were necessary.
My reception has been excellent. I can clearly receive not only all of the FM stations in New York City (about 60 miles away) and Philadelphia (about 55 miles away), I can also receive many other FM stations in New Jersey and Pennsylvania. At some places on my tuner's dial, I can rotate this antenna and pick up more than one station on the same frequency from different directions. Overall, I am pleased with my purchase.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Winegard HD-6000 FM and HD Digital Antenna



Buy NowGet 50% OFF

Click here for more information about Winegard HD-6000 FM and HD Digital Antenna

Read More...

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Winegard HD-6010 HD FM Radio Antenna Review

Winegard HD-6010 HD FM Radio Antenna
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
I've been on a long quest to get clear reception of my favorite radio station -- 60 miles away. I live in hilly, rural country, though I'm on one of those hills, which should help. The flexible dipole that came with my receiver wouldn't receive this station at all. I tried various "powered"(amplified) antennae that sit on the table -- loops, pyramids. One of them got me fuzzy reception, but that's it. I also tried a powered "bar-like" antenna mounted outdoors on the side of my house -- again with fuzzy reception. And then I tried a long (5-foot), spike-like antenna (quite expensive!); mounted on the best wall-location inside my garage, it worked reasonably well, though with some ever-present static. It was tolerable. Finally, I tried this Winegard HD-6010, post-mounted on the ceiling inside of my garage. Perfect! No static. I'm in heaven.I think powered antennae are just gimmicks -- amplified static. Go with basic physics and get yourself an omnidirectional like this one, appropriately located.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Winegard HD-6010 HD FM Radio Antenna



Buy NowGet 31% OFF

Click here for more information about Winegard HD-6010 HD FM Radio Antenna

Read More...

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Terk Hdr-I High-Definition Indoor Radio Antenna Review

Terk Hdr-I High-Definition Indoor Radio Antenna
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
My HD radio is a Sony XDR-S3HD. So this comparison is only true for this radio and my location (just north of Washington DC). I tried the accompanying wire and dipole antennas first, and then tried this Terk HDRI Antenna and a Philips Magnavox MANT-110 Indoor Passive Antenna. The Terk box says it is specifically for HD radio. The Philips box says it is for VHF/UHF/FM/HDTV.
The dipole worked best overall of the two included with the Sony but I experienced a number of drops when there was movement, either by myself or even my cats, on the far side of the antenna relative to the general direction of the station's tower that I was tuned into. The Terk (with the gain set to the maximum) and the Philips both worked better in this regard resulting in practically no drops in the same scenarios.
The Terk costs 36.14 on sale; the Philips costs 9.99. So the Philips wins on price. Here's the shocking thing. When I tried to tune into WAMU-HD3 or WTOP-HD3 or WCPS-HD3, the Terk had trouble picking up the signal unless I was positioned just right in the room (for example, if I was 5 feet from the antenna but not 3 feet, or if my TV was on, or...). The Philips has no problem picking up these stations regardless! This makes the Terk very much a disappointment. The Terk did not pick up any additional HD channel 2 stations compared with the Philips (the ones I can't pick up currently on a regular basis are WWWT, WPGC, WBIG and WPRS). So if you're having problems with the wire or dipole antenna, then my suggestion is to pick up the Philips or some other cheap indoor FM antenna and forgo spending money on this overpriced Terk.
Magnavox MANT-110 Indoor Passive Antenna

Click Here to see more reviews about: Terk Hdr-I High-Definition Indoor Radio Antenna



Buy NowGet 37% OFF

Click here for more information about Terk Hdr-I High-Definition Indoor Radio Antenna

Read More...